«
»

Share of Cost, California’s Hospital Fair Pricing Act Reduced The Prices Actually Paid By Uninsured Patients

Monday, Jun. 1st 2015 6:30 AM

California’s Hospital Fair Pricing Act, passed in 2006, aims to protect uninsured patients from paying hospital gross charges: the full, undiscounted prices based on each hospital’s chargemaster. In this study I examined how the law affects the net price actually paid by uninsured patients—a question critical for evaluating the law’s impact. I found that from 2004 to 2012 the net price actually paid by uninsured patients shrank from 6 percent higher than Medicare prices to 68 percent lower than Medicare prices; the adjusted collection ratio, essentially the amount the hospital actually collected for every dollar in gross price charged, for uninsured patients dropped from 32 percent to 11 percent; and although hospitals have been increasingly less able to generate revenues from uninsured patients, they have raised the proportion of services provided to them in relation to total services provided to all patients. The substantial protection provided to uninsured patients by the California Hospital Fair Pricing Act has important implications for federal and state policy makers seeking to achieve a similar goal. States or Congress could legislate criteria determining the eligibility for discounted charges, mandate a lower price ceiling, and regulate for-profit hospitals in regard to uninsured patients.

Related posts:

  1. Share of Cost, Medicare’s New Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program is Likely to Have Only a Small Impact on Hospital Payments Share of Cost, Medicare's New Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program is Likely to Have Only a Small Impact on Hospital Payments ...
  2. Share of Cost, New Rules to Require Equal Visitation Rights for All Hospital Patients Share of Cost, New Rules to Require Equal Visitation Rights for All Hospital Patients: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has issued new rules for Medicare- and Medicaid-participating hospitals that protect patients’ right to choose their own visitors during a hospital stay, including a visitor who is a same-sex domestic partner.  The rules require hospitals […]...
  3. Medicare’s Policy Not To Pay For Treating Hospital-Acquired Conditions: The Impact In 2008 Medicare stopped reimbursing hospitals for treating eight avoidable hospital-acquired conditions. Using 2006 California data, we modeled the financial impact of this policy on six such conditions. Hospital-acquired conditions were present in 0.11 percent of acute inpatient Medicare discharges; only 3 percent of these were affected by the policy. Payment reductions were negligible (0.001 […]...
  4. Low-Cost Transitional Care Phone Contact With Patients Cut Rehospitalization At A VA Hospital Low-Cost Transitional Care Phone Contact With Patients Cut Rehospitalization At A VA Hospital...
  5. How do insurance companies set prices for Medigap policies? How do insurance companies set prices for Medigap policies?...
  6. Hospital Pay-For-Performance Programs In Maryland Produced Strong Results Hospital Pay-For-Performance Programs In Maryland Produced Strong Results...
  7. Public Reporting On Hospital Process Improvements Is Linked To Better Patient Outcomes The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services publicly reports so-called process performance at all U.S. hospitals, such as whether certain recommended treatments are given to specific types of patients. We examined whether hospital performance on key process indicators improved during the three years since this reporting began. We also studied whether or not these changes […]...
  8. Share of Cost, Innovations At Miami Practice Show Promise For Treating High-Risk Medicare Patients Share of Cost, Innovations At Miami Practice Show Promise For Treating High-Risk Medicare Patients ...
  9. Share of Cost, Deteriorating Oral Health During Hospital Stays. Share of Cost, Deteriorating Oral Health During Hospital Stays....
  10. The Lessons of Medicare’s Prospective Payment System Show That the Bundled Payment Program Faces Challenges Policy makers have been trying to replace Medicare’s fee-for-service payment system for years with approaches that pay one price for an aggregation of services. The intent is to reward providers for offering needed care in the most appropriate and cost-effective manner. Medicare’s first payment change designed to accomplish such a change was the hospital prospective […]...
  11. Medicare And Medicaid Spending Variations are Strongly Linked Within Hospital Regions But Not at Overall State Level Medicare And Medicaid Spending Variations are Strongly Linked Within Hospital Regions But Not at Overall State Level...
  12. A Physician’s Experience In Front-Line Field Hospital In Libya To Help In Future Humanitarian Emergencies A Physician's Experience In Front-Line Field Hospital In Libya To Help In Future Humanitarian Emergencies...
  13. Share of Cost, Health Systems Should Be Re-Organized To Better Help Stroke Patients Share of Cost, Health Systems Should Be Re-Organized To Better Help Stroke Patients...
  14. Share of Cost, New Resource Helps Californians Find Quality Health Care Share of Cost, New Resource Helps Californians Find Quality Health Care...
  15. Analysis of Medicare Advantage HMOs Compared With Traditional Medicare Shows Lower Use of Many Services Analysis of Medicare Advantage HMOs Compared With Traditional Medicare Shows Lower Use of Many Services ...
Posted on Monday, Jun. 1st 2015 6:30 AM | by Share of Cost | in Share of Cost | Comments Off on Share of Cost, California’s Hospital Fair Pricing Act Reduced The Prices Actually Paid By Uninsured Patients